Samsung patent judge reprimanded

Apple claims Samsung tablet look at the right, one Samsung patent design compromises the patent judges including reprimand Korea high-tech companies and Apple testing starts press release after submission.

Judge Lucy Koh case ". They deliberately try to transfer knew the evidence had been excluded "and had been told.

She is "taint the jury" of the risk being added was.

But refused to punish her some valid patent Samsung she dominate Apple's request.

Samsung PR agency page 9 presentation reporter sent an email on Tuesday.

Apple prototype what is included in the evidence was based on your one of the handset so I thought Sony-based iPhone and. Aimed to undermine the design patent on the right.

Also working on the design such as iPhone Apple's device was announced ago the Office suggested that was and showed a Samsung mobile phone.

Korea company is too late for legal proceedings said she and were trying to block details of judges.

But included in the press release, said a statement from Samsung: "" is needed to determine if jury, fundamental fairness is based on all the evidence on the

Apple is after, "contamination of the jury" claimed and had to try.

Samsung reject it, "result" might be the trial after the judge Koh, said.

However, now she is "all play and we are here to do sideshow to distract from what the ????" and added that.

However, sure don't read the news articles including the prohibition of their information she made each question for the jury.

Objection overload suggested that Phil Schiller Apple Smartphone second new category created, iPhone

If Samsung infringed seven patents damage and its rival five intellectual property violation, unspecified share of the net sales of mobile devices it is Korea companies have to pay the party $2500000000 ( £ 1.6 bn ) and ???? Apple owe's claim.

Will the jury hear the total four weeks of evidence.

However, expressed her frustration at the delay caused by the number of judges also had been making an objection on side of each other.

She deducted plead now to dominate the time resulting from time as each objection barriers each side.

Vice President of global marketing, Philip Schiller of Apple was the first witness to testify in the trial Friday resumed after.

He success of the iPad "customers beautiful products and company and identify them value" "according to a copy provided by Forbes magazine, due to the fact.

His statement shows the value of Apple's design patent, Samsung was the damage caused by the infringement of them attempt to propose.

Speaking on the first day of the trial, told the jury Mr Schiller: "in the appearance of the range to copy Apple products for Galaxy S phone and appeared quite shocked'

He claimed "I thought that they did it again, going to just copy our entire product line is" when he saw the Samsung Galaxy tab

Denied, saying the manufacturer of Galaxy Tab, price, competitor's patent ", shows a little more than a blank rectangle" and "of abusive form of the articles of the" legal precedent to allow go against you.